Minnesota High Court Ruling Expands Tax Nexus for Out-of-State Businesses   Recently updated !


A recent ruling by the Minnesota Supreme Court has significantly broadened the state’s ability to assert tax jurisdiction over businesses with limited connections to the state. The decision, which upholds a lower court’s ruling in favor of the Minnesota Department of Revenue, could have far-reaching implications for multi-state businesses operating in the state.

The case centered on Uline, a company that conducts market research and solicits sales in Minnesota. Uline argued that its activities were protected by the Federal Interstate Income Act of 1959 (P.L. 86-272), which generally exempts out-of-state businesses from state income taxes if their only activity within the state is the solicitation of orders. However, the court rejected Uline’s argument, ruling that the company’s market research activities constituted more than mere solicitation.

The decision effectively narrows the scope of P.L. 86-272, making it easier for states to impose taxes on out-of-state businesses. This could lead to increased tax burdens for many companies, particularly smaller businesses that may not have the resources to comply with complex state tax laws.

Key Implications of the Ruling:

  • Increased Tax Burden: Businesses operating in Minnesota may face higher tax liabilities due to the expanded definition of taxable nexus.
  • Increased Compliance Costs: Companies will need to carefully evaluate their in-state activities to determine if they create a taxable nexus, which could lead to increased record-keeping and legal expenses.
  • Uncertainty: The lack of clear guidelines in the ruling could create uncertainty for businesses and may lead to increased litigation.
  • Potential for Broader Impact: Other states may follow Minnesota’s lead, further complicating the tax landscape for multi-state businesses.

As a result of this ruling, businesses operating in Minnesota should carefully review their in-state activities and consider consulting with tax professionals to ensure compliance with state tax laws. The decision also highlights the need for federal legislation to provide greater clarity and consistency regarding state taxation of interstate commerce.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.